Challenge
The project involved complex, fragmented data, from geospatial and climate information to budgets and HR, making automation and predictions unreliable. Users needed clarity on what the system “knew” versus didn’t, while the organization’s low AI maturity made it hard to align technical possibilities with real user needs
Approach
As part of the EMMA team, I took a proactive role in laying the foundations for human-centered AI integration: advocated for involving end users early to shape use cases based on real pain points, not just technical possibility, and played a key part on developing a user-centered AI strategy, for adoption across MOATA products

EMMA Visual Identity
Simple, accessible and trusthworthy
Brand integration with distinction
Seamlessly fit within the MOATA ecosystem while standing out as a recognizable new feature
Accessibility for all users
From technical experts to non-technical stakeholders, making EMMA approachable across complex project lifecycles
Simplicity and legibility
The visual identity emphasized clarity and platform-agnostic design, ensuring usability across diverse contexts and interfaces.

MOATA Integration
Integrating EMMA across MOATA products required navigating a rigid architecture and addressing the varied needs of different tools and their users
The process involved multiple rounds of wireframing and close collaboration with front and backend engineers to develop a cohesive MVP that could function across platforms while remaining user friendly and adaptable to diverse workflows
Communicating value
Early adoption and user feedback
EMMA V2 was launched within MOATA, focused on gathering early feedback and inform further development. Initial response from users was largely positive, particularly around the clarity, usability and easy access
















